Bateman v. State

269 So. 2d 694
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 1972
DocketNo. 72-359
StatusPublished

This text of 269 So. 2d 694 (Bateman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bateman v. State, 269 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion filed in the trial court pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, 33 F.S.A., is an improper procedure by which to raise the question of a frustrated appeal. The appropriate procedure to seek delayed appellate review due to frustration of appeal by state action is by petition for writ of habeas corpus to the appropriate appellate court. Powe v. State, 216 So.2d 446 (Fla.1968); Jackson v. State, 227 So.2d 354 (Fla.App.1969).

Accordingly, our decision affirming the trial court’s denial of the Rule 3.850 motion is without prejudice to the appellant to proceed by way of habeas corpus.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powe v. State
216 So. 2d 446 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Jackson v. State
227 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 So. 2d 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateman-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.