Bateman v. Riner

1934 OK 704, 38 P.2d 581, 170 Okla. 13, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 657
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 11, 1934·No. 25563·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding in error was begun by the filing of the petition in error with case-made attached on May 11, 1934.

It appears by motion filed herein under date of October 12, 1934, that on the 10th. day of October, 1934, there was filed in the office of the court clerk of Nowata county, Okla., from which court this appeal is taken, a written satisfaction of the judgment. There is ixo contest filed against this motion, and it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the same is true. The appeal is therefore dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bateman v. Riner, 1934 OK 704, 38 P.2d 581, 170 Okla. 13, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 657 (Okla. 1934).

1934 OK 704 (Bateman v. Riner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.
1995 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1995)
Grand River Dam Authority v. Eaton
1990 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Hart v. Jett Enterprises, Inc.
744 P.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.
1946 OK 198 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)