Bateman v. Bateman

Texas Supreme Court

Bateman v. Bateman

25 Tex. 270

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 270 (Bateman v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bateman v. Bateman, 25 Tex. 270 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Roberts, J.

The wife had separate property consisting in part of cattle and horses. The decree, of partition gives to her the increase, during the marriage, of the said cattle and horses as part of her separate estate. In this there was error as it has been determined by this court.

The other questions of the case are not of a character to re[271]*271quire any discussion, being either matters of fact or rulings upon the evidence which may not arise upon another trial.

For this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts, J.

The wife had separate property consisting in part of cattle and horses. The decree, of partition gives to her the increase, during the marriage, of the said cattle and horses as part of her separate estate. In this there was error as it has been determined by this court.

The other questions of the case are not of a character to re[271]*271quire any discussion, being either matters of fact or rulings upon the evidence which may not arise upon another trial.

For this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateman-v-bateman-tex-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack