Batchelor v. Grumman

Fourth Circuit

Batchelor v. Grumman

297 F. App'x 223

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2008·No. No. 08-1491·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Batchelor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court’s memorandum and order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Batchelor v. Northrop, No. 1:07-cv-01032-WMN (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Batchelor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court’s memorandum and order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Batchelor v. Northrop, No. 1:07-cv-01032-WMN (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Batchelor v. Grumman, 297 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

297 F. App'x 223 (Batchelor v. Grumman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.