Batchelor v. Batchelor

68 N.E.2d 681, 295 N.Y. 544
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 1946·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Before plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of separation upon the ground that defendant had failed to support her while they were living separate and apart by mutual consent, it was necessary for her to establish that she offered *545 in good faith to return to her husband and resume the marital status. Lack óf that proof required a dismissal of her second cause of action. (Solomon v. Solomon, 290 N. Y. 337. 340-341; cf. Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74, 82.) Accordingly it was error to direct judgment of separation in favor of plaintiff and against the- defendant. Insofar as the judgment directs that plaintiff is entitled to a separation and alimony it should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, without costs; otherwise the judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

The judgments should be modified in accordance with this opinion, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Loughrax, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thaoher, JJ., concur; Dye and Fuld, JJ., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batchelor v. Batchelor, 68 N.E.2d 681, 295 N.Y. 544 (N.Y. 1946).

68 N.E.2d 681 (Batchelor v. Batchelor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinberg v. Steinberg
223 N.E.2d 558 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Steinberg v. Steinberg
25 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Eylman v. Eylman
23 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Fremont v. Fremont
19 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
People ex rel. Roosevelt v. Roosevelt
13 A.D.2d 334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Garfinkel v. Garefinkel
28 Misc. 2d 483 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Mullane v. Mullane
29 Misc. 2d 194 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Dominick v. Dominick
26 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Eckerson v. Eckerson
283 A.D. 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Rizzi v. Rizzi
279 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Staniszewski v. Staniszewski
277 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Filicaza v. Filicaza
192 Misc. 76 (New York Family Court, 1948)
Cannon v. Cannon
190 Misc. 677 (New York Family Court, 1947)