Batchelder v. Shapleigh
10 Me. 135
Opinion
We are satisfied that the mill-saw cannot be regarded as a tool, exempted from attachment under the statute. It is not an instrument worked by hand, or by muscular power; but part of a mill propelled by water. The exemption under the statute cannot be sustained to the extent claimed by the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Batchelder v. Shapleigh, 10 Me. 135 (Me. 1833).
10 Me. 135 (Batchelder v. Shapleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thresher v. McEvoy
193 S.W. 159 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Tucker v. Napier
1 White & W. 365 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)