Batchelder v. Shapleigh
10 Me. 135
This text of 10 Me. 135 (Batchelder v. Shapleigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Batchelder v. Shapleigh, 10 Me. 135 (Me. 1833).
Opinion
We are satisfied that the mill-saw cannot be regarded as a tool, exempted from attachment under the statute. It is not an instrument worked by hand, or by muscular power; but part of a mill propelled by water. The exemption under the statute cannot be sustained to the extent claimed by the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thresher v. McEvoy
193 S.W. 159 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Tucker v. Napier
1 White & W. 365 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Me. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batchelder-v-shapleigh-me-1833.