Batchelder v. Hibbard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Batchelder v. Hibbard

60 N.H. 581

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Batchelder v. Hibbard. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 N.H. 269 →

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1880·Published

Opinion

*582 Smith, J.

The defendant having contended, on the former reservation of this case (58 N. H. 296), that he had revoked the plaintiffs’ license, the report was recommitted. The case now before us is a copy of a second report of the committee, which does not show any question of law raised by either party. The defendant does not present the question whether the petition can be maintained by a licensee, and does not, by brief or otherwise, insist upon his exception to the order for judgment made at the October term, 1876.

Case discharged.

Doe, O. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*582 Smith, J.

The defendant having contended, on the former reservation of this case (58 N. H. 296), that he had revoked the plaintiffs’ license, the report was recommitted. The case now before us is a copy of a second report of the committee, which does not show any question of law raised by either party. The defendant does not present the question whether the petition can be maintained by a licensee, and does not, by brief or otherwise, insist upon his exception to the order for judgment made at the October term, 1876.

Case discharged.

Doe, O. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Batchelder v. Hibbard, 60 N.H. 581 (N.H. 1880).

Pincite

60 N.H. 581 (Batchelder v. Hibbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related