Batchelder v. Barber

67 Vt. 254
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedOctober 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Vt. 254 (Batchelder v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batchelder v. Barber, 67 Vt. 254 (Vt. 1894).

Opinion

TAFT, J.

Two questions were argued in this cause by the counsel for the defendant, but it is unnecessary to consider them, for the plaintiff concedes that he cannot recover the amount of the draft in question, for that it does not appear that the defendant while residing without the state did not have known property within the state that could have been attached by the common process of law. To entitle him to recover, it was necessary he should establish that fact. Stevens v. Fisher, 30 Vt. 200.

Judgment reversed, and judgment for the plaintiff ■for the smaller sum named in the report.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burnham v. Courser
69 Vt. 183 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Vt. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batchelder-v-barber-vt-1894.