Batal v. Flynn

189 N.E.2d 528, 345 Mass. 779
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E.2d 528 (Batal v. Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batal v. Flynn, 189 N.E.2d 528, 345 Mass. 779 (Mass. 1963).

Opinion

Decree affirmed. We cannot rule that the special administrator’s fee of $7,000 awarded by the Probate Court decree exceeded just and reasonable compensation. See McMahon v. Krapf, 323 Mass. 118, 123, and cases cited; Wilson v. Askinas, 325 Mass. 136, 138; Phelan v. McCabe, 343 Mass. 585, 588-589. The inventory showed a personal estate of $454,804.01 and real estate in New Hampshire valued at $6,000. The probate judge found that the special administrator expended some 360 hours of his time in conducting his administration promptly and carefully. The services which were performed in a period of over a year are set out in detail in the judge’s findings. The allowance of $81.86 for expenses is not contested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phelan v. McCabe
179 N.E.2d 887 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
McMahon v. Krapf
80 N.E.2d 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Wilson v. Askinas
89 N.E.2d 343 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 N.E.2d 528, 345 Mass. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batal-v-flynn-mass-1963.