BASTUNAS v. Giltner

280 S.W.3d 797, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, 2009 WL 1058150
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2009·No. ED 91793·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Giltner (hereinafter, “Giltner”) appeals from the judgment awarding Steven Bastunas (hereinafter, “Bastunas”) $9,000.00, from a contract for Bastunas to assist Giltner in refinancing his home. Giltner raises one point on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in finding there was legal consideration to support the contract upon which Bastunas filed suit.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASTUNAS v. Giltner, 280 S.W.3d 797, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, 2009 WL 1058150 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 797 (BASTUNAS v. Giltner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.