Bastin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bastin v. State

1922 OK CR 72, 204 P. 174, 21 Okla. Crim. 159, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 6, 1922

DocketNo. A-3894.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 72 (Bastin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bastin v. State, 1922 OK CR 72, 204 P. 174, 21 Okla. Crim. 159, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joe Bastin, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession certain *160 intoxicating liquors, to wit, 15 gallons of Cboctaw beer, with, intent to sell tbe same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury-was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a fine of $200 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was duly perfected, but no brief has been filed and no appearance made in this court in behalf of plaintiff in error, and for this reason, when the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment of conviction.

The uncontroverted proof on the part of the state supports the averments of the information and shows that the said Choctaw beer found' in the possession of the defendant, upon analysis, contained four per cent, of alcohol, measured by volume.

An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Joe Bastin, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession certain *160 intoxicating liquors, to wit, 15 gallons of Cboctaw beer, with, intent to sell tbe same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury-was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a fine of $200 and the costs. From the judgment an appeal was duly perfected, but no brief has been filed and no appearance made in this court in behalf of plaintiff in error, and for this reason, when the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment of conviction.

The uncontroverted proof on the part of the state supports the averments of the information and shows that the said Choctaw beer found' in the possession of the defendant, upon analysis, contained four per cent, of alcohol, measured by volume.

An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 72, 204 P. 174, 21 Okla. Crim. 159, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bastin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.