Bastian v. Jaramillo

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO THOMAS O. BASTIAN Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 21-350 WJ/JFR HEATHER JARAMILLO et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”), filed June 21, 2023 (Doc. 55), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs Motion Requesting Leave to Joinder Joinder [sic] Additional Plaintiff (“Motion”) (Doc. 21). Objections to the PFRD were due by no later than July 5, 2023, with three additional days permitted for mailing. See Doc. 55. Plaintiff has not filed any objections, and the deadline has expired. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10" Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD (Doc. 55) is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs Motion is thereby DENIED.

WILLIAM P. JOHNSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE