Basson v. Edjomac Amusement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Basson v. Edjomac Amusement Corp.

259 A.D. 1005, 20 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1005 (Basson v. Edjomac Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Basson v. Edjomac Amusement Corp., 259 A.D. 1005, 20 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to the defendant-respondent, to answer within twenty days after service of order on payment of said costs. Facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action are set forth in the amended complaint. It is alleged in part that when the defendants took over the operation and control of the theatre and its business, each of them “ knew of the aforesaid contracts, and assumed and adopted the same as if the same were signed by the defendant Edjomac Amusement Corporation and each of them individually; and for a long time thereafter operated the said theatre under, pursuant to, and in accordance with the terms of the said contracts.” Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to the defendant-respondent, to answer within twenty days after service of order on payment of said costs. Facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action are set forth in the amended complaint. It is alleged in part that when the defendants took over the operation and control of the theatre and its business, each of them “ knew of the aforesaid contracts, and assumed and adopted the same as if the same were signed by the defendant Edjomac Amusement Corporation and each of them individually; and for a long time thereafter operated the said theatre under, pursuant to, and in accordance with the terms of the said contracts.” Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1005, 20 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basson-v-edjomac-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1940.