Bassim v. Halliday
683 N.E.2d 771, 90 N.Y.2d 839, 660 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2205
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bassim v. Halliday. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 N.Y.2d 1001 →
Opinion
Motion for reconsideration of the Court of Appeals March 25, 1997 dismissal order denied. [See, 89 NY2d 1001.] Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bassim v. Halliday, 683 N.E.2d 771, 90 N.Y.2d 839, 660 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2205 (N.Y. 1997).
683 N.E.2d 771 (Bassim v. Halliday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bassim v. Halliday
679 N.E.2d 638 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)