Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bassik v. Lemenik

Bassik v. Lemenik

204 A.D.2d 670, 614 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 670 (Bassik v. Lemenik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bassik v. Lemenik, 204 A.D.2d 670, 614 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated October 5, 1992, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs established a prima facie showing of "[sjerious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the court [671]*671did not err in denying summary judgment to the defendant (see generally, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230; cf., Nunez v Dabrowski, 185 AD2d 269; Crane v Richard, 180 AD2d 706). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Licari v. Elliott
441 N.E.2d 1088 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Crane v. Richard
180 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Nunez v. Dabrowski
185 A.D.2d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.2d 670, 614 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassik-v-lemenik-nyappdiv-1994.