Bassik v. Lemenik

204 A.D.2d 670, 614 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated October 5, 1992, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs established a prima facie showing of "[sjerious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the court [671]*671did not err in denying summary judgment to the defendant (see generally, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230; cf., Nunez v Dabrowski, 185 AD2d 269; Crane v Richard, 180 AD2d 706). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bassik v. Lemenik, 204 A.D.2d 670, 614 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 670 (Bassik v. Lemenik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Licari v. Elliott
441 N.E.2d 1088 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Crane v. Richard
180 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Nunez v. Dabrowski
185 A.D.2d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)