Bassi v. Lavornia

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Bassi v. Lavornia

636 A.2d 1332, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1994 WL 33931

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

DocketNo. 93-266-Appeal

StatusPublished

This text of 636 A.2d 1332 (Bassi v. Lavornia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bassi v. Lavornia, 636 A.2d 1332, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1994 WL 33931 (R.I. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument January 27, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed the plaintiff to appear and show cause why his appeal should not be denied and dismissed.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The determination concerning whether the plaintiff had agreed to perform services for the defendant Richard B. Lavornia, Sr. as an individual or with the corporation, Richard B. Lavornia & Sons, Inc., was a factual determination. The trial justice was not clearly wrong in her finding of fact.

Consequently, the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of the individual defendant, Richard B. Lavornia, Sr., is denied and dismissed. The judgment entered in the Superior Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument January 27, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed the plaintiff to appear and show cause why his appeal should not be denied and dismissed.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The determination concerning whether the plaintiff had agreed to perform services for the defendant Richard B. Lavornia, Sr. as an individual or with the corporation, Richard B. Lavornia & Sons, Inc., was a factual determination. The trial justice was not clearly wrong in her finding of fact.

Consequently, the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of the individual defendant, Richard B. Lavornia, Sr., is denied and dismissed. The judgment entered in the Superior Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

636 A.2d 1332, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1994 WL 33931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassi-v-lavornia-ri-1994.