Bassett v. Miller

39 Mich. 133, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 236
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.

This case presents, as we think, but one important question, and that is whether surviving partners who sell goods which belong to their firm can recover for their price in their own names, without joining the representatives of the deceased partner. The principle is well settled that the entire legal estate vests in the survivors, and no one else can be regarded as having any legal interest in the assets. Barry v. Briggs, 22 Mich., 201; Pfeffer v. Steiner, 27 Mich., 537; Merritt v. Dickey, 38 Mich., 41.

The court erred in holding that the survivors could not sue for goods sold by them until they had an assignment or had formally, organized a new firm.

[134]*134The other questions are not very distinctly presented and need not be considered. There was evidence tending to show liability which the jury could consider.

Judgment must be reversed with costs and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bassett v. Miller, 39 Mich. 133, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 236 (Mich. 1878).

39 Mich. 133 (Bassett v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Marrs
1938 OK 462 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
People's National Bank v. Wilcox
100 N.W. 24 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Reese v. Kinkead
17 Nev. 447 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1883)