Bassett v. Marshall
9 Mass. 312
Opinion
were of opinion that, since it was proved that the magistrate made no record of his administering the oath, the evidence admitted was the 1 ¿st that could be required. The testimony [282]*282of the witnesses was therefore legally admitted, and was competent to prove the fact.
The judgment was affirmed, with costs for the defendant in error.
Vide Sherman vs. Needham, 4 Pick. 67. — Commonwealth vs. Hall, 3 Pick. 262. — Commonwealth vs. Dedham, 16 Mass. 141.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bassett v. Marshall, 9 Mass. 312 (Mass. 1812).
9 Mass. 312 (Bassett v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klauber v. Charlton
47 Wis. 564 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Pons v. State
49 Miss. 1 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1873)
Pease v. Smith
41 Mass. 122 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1834)
Briggs v. Murdock
30 Mass. 305 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)
Bank of United States v. Dandridge
25 U.S. 64 (Supreme Court, 1827)
Commonwealth v. Hall
20 Mass. 262 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)