Bassett v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Bassett v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.

4 Conn. Supp. 105, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 114

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJuly 2, 1936

DocketFile #47428

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Supp. 105 (Bassett v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bassett v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co., 4 Conn. Supp. 105, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 114 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLS, J.

The applicant rendered services to the Receiver, the First National Bank, for which it .has not been paid. The work was done in pursuance of a contract approved by the Court. The bill ought to have been presented to the original receiver and paid by it before it turned over the estate to the successor receiver. Good reason has been shown to this Court on this hearing as to why the bill was not so presented. It is therefore in order that it be now paid by the present receiver.

The remaining question is as to the amount. In fairness, it should be the same sum which would have been paid if the bill had been presented to the original receiver, and working on that basis I arrive at the sum of $21?., which the receiver is directed to pay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELLS, J.

The applicant rendered services to the Receiver, the First National Bank, for which it .has not been paid. The work was done in pursuance of a contract approved by the Court. The bill ought to have been presented to the original receiver and paid by it before it turned over the estate to the successor receiver. Good reason has been shown to this Court on this hearing as to why the bill was not so presented. It is therefore in order that it be now paid by the present receiver.

The remaining question is as to the amount. In fairness, it should be the same sum which would have been paid if the bill had been presented to the original receiver, and working on that basis I arrive at the sum of $21?., which the receiver is directed to pay.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Supp. 105, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassett-v-broadway-bank-trust-co-connsuperct-1936.