Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne
135 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 735, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 402
Opinion
after stating the case: The judgment must be affirmed on authority of Burton v. Smith, 191 N. C., 599, and Rogers v. Piland, 178 N. C., 70. It would only be a work of supererogation to state again what has so recently been said in these cases. See, also, Foster v. Allison Corp., 191 N. C., 166, and Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 400.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne, 135 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 735, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 402 (N.C. 1926).
135 S.E. 926 (Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers v. . Piland
100 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Foster v. Allison Corp.
191 N.C. 166 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)