Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne

135 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 735, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 402

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 926 (Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bassett Lumber Co. v. Rhyne, 135 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 735, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 402 (N.C. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: The judgment must be affirmed on authority of Burton v. Smith, 191 N. C., 599, and Rogers v. Piland, 178 N. C., 70. It would only be a work of supererogation to state again what has so recently been said in these cases. See, also, Foster v. Allison Corp., 191 N. C., 166, and Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 400.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: The judgment must be affirmed on authority of Burton v. Smith, 191 N. C., 599, and Rogers v. Piland, 178 N. C., 70. It would only be a work of supererogation to state again what has so recently been said in these cases. See, also, Foster v. Allison Corp., 191 N. C., 166, and Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 400.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 735, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassett-lumber-co-v-rhyne-nc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack