Bassem v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit

Bassem v. Gonzales

143 F. App'x 885

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 20, 2005

DocketNo. 03-71884

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 885 (Bassem v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bassem v. Gonzales, 143 F. App'x 885 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Petitioner Mahasn Bassem applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The immigration judge denied his application based on an adverse credibility finding, which the BIA affirmed. Bassem now petitions for review.

The panel reviews the IJ’s denial of the petition for substantial evidence. Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). Bassem’s testimony contained a material inconsistency as to the number of times he claims he was electrically shocked by the Syrian government. In his application for asylum, he stated that he received electrical shocks three-times per week during his incarceration. During his testimony before the IJ, he stated he received electrical shocks three-times over his two-month incarceration, a statement he repeated upon the IJ’s clarification. This inconsistency goes to the heart of Bassem’s asylum application. It is, therefore, material and as a result, the adverse credibility finding by the IJ was supported by substantial evidence.

Bassem also filed a motion to stay voluntary departure. This motion is moot because it is treated as being included within his prior motion to stay removal. Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 743 (9th Cir.2004). Nonetheless, we must calculate the remaining number of voluntary departure days available to Bassem. On April 7, 2003, the BIA granted Bassem thirty-days to depart voluntarily. On May 6, 2003, Bassem filed his motion to stay removal. Applying Fed. R.App. P. 26(a) and this Court’s holding in Desta, 365 F.3d at 750, Bassem has one-day from the issuance of this mandate to depart voluntarily from the United States before the Attorney General may enter a removal order.

PETITION DENIED; MOTION DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Petitioner Mahasn Bassem applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The immigration judge denied his application based on an adverse credibility finding, which the BIA affirmed. Bassem now petitions for review.

The panel reviews the IJ’s denial of the petition for substantial evidence. Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). Bassem’s testimony contained a material inconsistency as to the number of times he claims he was electrically shocked by the Syrian government. In his application for asylum, he stated that he received electrical shocks three-times per week during his incarceration. During his testimony before the IJ, he stated he received electrical shocks three-times over his two-month incarceration, a statement he repeated upon the IJ’s clarification. This inconsistency goes to the heart of Bassem’s asylum application. It is, therefore, material and as a result, the adverse credibility finding by the IJ was supported by substantial evidence.

Bassem also filed a motion to stay voluntary departure. This motion is moot because it is treated as being included within his prior motion to stay removal. Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 743 (9th Cir.2004). Nonetheless, we must calculate the remaining number of voluntary departure days available to Bassem. On April 7, 2003, the BIA granted Bassem thirty-days to depart voluntarily. On May 6, 2003, Bassem filed his motion to stay removal. Applying Fed. R.App. P. 26(a) and this Court’s holding in Desta, 365 F.3d at 750, Bassem has one-day from the issuance of this mandate to depart voluntarily from the United States before the Attorney General may enter a removal order.

PETITION DENIED; MOTION DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassem-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack