Bassam Trading Co. v. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bassam Trading Co. v. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc.

172 So. 3d 960, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574, 2015 WL 4577273

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-1788

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 3d 960 (Bassam Trading Co. v. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bassam Trading Co. v. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc., 172 So. 3d 960, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574, 2015 WL 4577273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bassam Trading Company, Ltd. appeals the trial court’s Final Order Enforcing Settlement Agreement (“Final Order”). It argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the parties agreed on an enforceable settlement agreement. As to this issue, we affirm without further discussion. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. has filed a cross-appeal claiming that the trial court erred in establishing October 21, 2014, as the effective date of the settlement agreement. We agree, reverse that part of the Final Order, and remand this case to the trial court to enter an Amended Final Order establishing November 14, 2013, as the effective date. This correction will ensure that the date of the settlement agreement and the release are the same.

[961]*961AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and LAMBERT, JJ„ and McKIBBEN, K.J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bassam Trading Company, Ltd. appeals the trial court’s Final Order Enforcing Settlement Agreement (“Final Order”). It argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the parties agreed on an enforceable settlement agreement. As to this issue, we affirm without further discussion. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. has filed a cross-appeal claiming that the trial court erred in establishing October 21, 2014, as the effective date of the settlement agreement. We agree, reverse that part of the Final Order, and remand this case to the trial court to enter an Amended Final Order establishing November 14, 2013, as the effective date. This correction will ensure that the date of the settlement agreement and the release are the same.

[961]*961AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and LAMBERT, JJ„ and McKIBBEN, K.J., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 3d 960, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574, 2015 WL 4577273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bassam-trading-co-v-wheeled-coach-industries-inc-fladistctapp-2015.