Bass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bass v. State

457 S.W.3d 394, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 248, 2015 WL 1119673

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. No. ED 101720·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Bass appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Bass appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Bass v. State, 457 S.W.3d 394, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 248, 2015 WL 1119673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

457 S.W.3d 394 (Bass v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related