Bass v. Milledgeville

295 U.S. 721, 55 S. Ct. 926
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 3, 1935
DocketNo. 976
StatusPublished

This text of 295 U.S. 721 (Bass v. Milledgeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bass v. Milledgeville, 295 U.S. 721, 55 S. Ct. 926 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to substitute L. N. Jordan as a party appellee is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought herein to be reviewed is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111-112; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672 et seq.; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U, S. 447, 450.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Chesborough
228 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Utley v. St. Petersburg
292 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 U.S. 721, 55 S. Ct. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-v-milledgeville-scotus-1935.