Bass v. Grace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bass v. Grace

37 A.D.2d 529, 322 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 529 (Bass v. Grace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bass v. Grace, 37 A.D.2d 529, 322 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 18, 1970, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. None of the parties evinces any serious disagreement with the order of Special Term, though all express some uncertainty as to its ordering provisions. For purposes of clarity we explain that the order directs the respondent executors to deliver to the Sheriff forthwith, and pursuant to the attachment obtained by the petitioner, the balance of the sum awarded by the Surrogate to the attachment debtor after deducting therefrom the amounts directed by the Surrogate to be paid to the interveners Murray and Hackett. The order also directs the executors to pay to the Sheriff a sum equal to the difference between the amount to be forthwith delivered in accord with the above and the amount attached if and when the Surrogate directs any payment to the attachment debtor on account of interest of the attachment debtor in the estate of the deceased. Concur— Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Nunez, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 18, 1970, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. None of the parties evinces any serious disagreement with the order of Special Term, though all express some uncertainty as to its ordering provisions. For purposes of clarity we explain that the order directs the respondent executors to deliver to the Sheriff forthwith, and pursuant to the attachment obtained by the petitioner, the balance of the sum awarded by the Surrogate to the attachment debtor after deducting therefrom the amounts directed by the Surrogate to be paid to the interveners Murray and Hackett. The order also directs the executors to pay to the Sheriff a sum equal to the difference between the amount to be forthwith delivered in accord with the above and the amount attached if and when the Surrogate directs any payment to the attachment debtor on account of interest of the attachment debtor in the estate of the deceased. Concur— Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Nunez, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 529, 322 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-v-grace-nyappdiv-1971.