Bass v. Berry

51 Cal. 264
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1876
DocketNo. 4936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 264 (Bass v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bass v. Berry, 51 Cal. 264 (Cal. 1876).

Opinion

By the Court:

The action being founded upon an instrument in writing executed out of the State, the statutory bar of two years presumptively applies. If the plaintiff’s case could be relieved in this respect by the fact of the absence of the defendant from the State, that fact should have been averred in the complaint. The absence of the defendant would be a fact exceptional in its character; and unless such absence were alleged in the complaint, his presence in the State must be intended.

We think, therefore, that the demurrer to the complaint was correctly sustained, and that the judgment must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. Shannon
77 P.2d 498 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Pleasant v. Samuels
45 P. 998 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Lake v. Steinbach
32 P. 767 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-v-berry-cal-1876.