Bass v. Bailey

Fifth Circuit

Bass v. Bailey

172 F.2d 212, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2671

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1949

DocketNo. 12395

StatusPublished

This text of 172 F.2d 212 (Bass v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bass v. Bailey, 172 F.2d 212, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2671 (5th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinions

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

This record is identical with that in Bass v. Hoagland, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 205, this day decided, except that the plaintiff in the judgment here sued on is named Edna Pearl Bailey and the amount -she sued for and recovered in the Kansas court was $15,475. Everything we said in the opinion in Hoagland’s case exactly applies here. For the reasons therein stated the judgment appealed from is set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

This record is identical with that in Bass v. Hoagland, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 205, this day decided, except that the plaintiff in the judgment here sued on is named Edna Pearl Bailey and the amount -she sued for and recovered in the Kansas court was $15,475. Everything we said in the opinion in Hoagland’s case exactly applies here. For the reasons therein stated the judgment appealed from is set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 F.2d 212, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-v-bailey-ca5-1949.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack