Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. American Railway Express Co.

126 S.E. 112, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 406
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 24, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 S.E. 112 (Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. American Railway Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. American Railway Express Co., 126 S.E. 112, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 406 (N.C. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have heard the arguments of counsel, read the record carefully and gone over the well prepared and exhaustive briefs of the parties. The judge of the Forsyth County Court, in a full and very complete charge, gave fairly the contentions of the parties and charged the law on all the issues, as seems to us, with care and accuracy. The exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant on appeal to the Superior Court were not sustained, and judgment for the plaintiff was confirmed by the Superior Court. Hines v. R. R., 185 N. C., p. 72; Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mill, ante, 89.

We can find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawry v. Devine
410 P.2d 761 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 112, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-ex-rel-bass-v-american-railway-express-co-nc-1925.