Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. American Railway Express Co.
This text of 126 S.E. 112 (Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. American Railway Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have heard the arguments of counsel, read the record carefully and gone over the well prepared and exhaustive briefs of the parties. The judge of the Forsyth County Court, in a full and very complete charge, gave fairly the contentions of the parties and charged the law on all the issues, as seems to us, with care and accuracy. The exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant on appeal to the Superior Court were not sustained, and judgment for the plaintiff was confirmed by the Superior Court. Hines v. R. R., 185 N. C., p. 72; Crisp v. Hanover Thread Mill, ante, 89.
We can find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 S.E. 112, 189 N.C. 826, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-ex-rel-bass-v-american-railway-express-co-nc-1925.