Bass & Co. v. Bearden

65 S.E. 692, 6 Ga. App. 696, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 429
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 5, 1909·No. 1794·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

J. 0. Bass & Co. sued W. D. Bearden in a justice’s court, as the maker of a promissory note payable to themselves. The justice, in writing the name of the plaintiff, in the original summons, left off the words “& Co.,” and also left out the same words in entering the ease on his docket, leaving the case pending as one brought by J. C. Bass against W. D. Bearden. A copy of the note sued on was attached to the summons. Held: (1) An amendment adding the words “& Co.” to the original summons and to the entry of the case on the docket was improperly allowed, as this was adding a new party plaintiff. (2) An appeal by J. C. Bass & Co. from the judgment rendered by the justice in the case of J. C. Bass v. W. D. Bearden should have been dismissed, unless the words “& Co.” had been stricken by the appellant. The judgment of the superior court sustaining the certiorari is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bass & Co. v. Bearden, 65 S.E. 692, 6 Ga. App. 696, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 429 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 692 (Bass & Co. v. Bearden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nix v. Luke
99 S.E.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
McKenzie v. Loew Manufacturing Co.
93 S.E. 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)