Basnight v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc.

535 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2013·No. No. 13-1137·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Basnight seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of modification of an award of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006), and subsequent decision denying reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. [260] Accordingly, we deny Basnight’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Basnight v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., BRB No. 12-0108 (B.R.B. Sept. 25, 2012; Dec. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Basnight v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., 535 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2013).

535 F. App'x 259 (Basnight v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-950
33 U.S.C. § 901-950
§ 901
33 U.S.C. § 901