Basnight v. Basnight

89 S.E.2d 259, 242 N.C. 645, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 651
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 28, 1955·No. 104·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PeR Cuhiam.

Two members of the Court, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., not sitting, but with Devin, Emergency Justice, participating in lieu of Winborne, J., and the Court being of the unanimous opinion that the judgment entered below is erroneous in directing that the defendant be committed to jail for an indefinite period rather than for thirty days as prescribed by statute, G.S. 5-4, but with the six sitting members of the Court being evenly divided in opinion whether prejudicial or reversible error otherwise has been shown, the judgment below will be modified so as to limit the defendant’s confinement in jail to thirty days. Subject to this modification, the judgment is affirmed in accordance with the precedents which require a majority vote to overthrow a judgment of the Superior Court. Alexander v. Autens Auto Hire, 175 N.C. 720, 95 S.E. 850.

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Basnight v. Basnight, 89 S.E.2d 259, 242 N.C. 645, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 651 (N.C. 1955).

89 S.E.2d 259 (Basnight v. Basnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. Cox
179 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Smith v. Smith
103 S.E.2d 400 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)