Baskir v. Stewart

21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15928, 1994 WL 123946
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1994
Docket93-1692
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 421 (Baskir v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baskir v. Stewart, 21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15928, 1994 WL 123946 (3d Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Genie BASKIR, individually, Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Tom Morris, d/b/a Yesterworld (USA), Plaintiff,
v.
William ("Bill") STEWART, individually; Merrie Stewart,
individually; Andrew Ottaway, individually, Defendants,
v.
Penny Carr, individually; Art's Mobile Homes, Incorporated,
Third Party Defendants Appellees,
and
Earle V. "Buddy" Almy, Jr., individually; George E. Smith,
individually; Bill Stewart, Incorporated, Third
Party Defendants.

No. 93-1692.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 21, 1994.
Decided April 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-517-A)

Genie Baskir, appellant pro se.

David Clifton Schroeder, Murphy, McGettigan, Richards & West, P.C., Alexandria, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from an order remanding the underlying case back to state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. The action was removed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441(b) (1988); consequently, the district court's order remanding the action to state court is not reviewable. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1447(d) (1988).

We dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15928, 1994 WL 123946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baskir-v-stewart-ca3-1994.