Baskett v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 788, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 389, 1981 WL 21485
United States Court of Claims·Decided July 21, 1981·No. Nos. 161-78, 340-78, 317-79L, 311-80L and 616-80·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

per curiam:

Plaintiffs petition for review of the decision (dated May 19, 1981) of Trial Judge Miller, Chief of the Trial Division, refusing to direct the disqualification of Trial Judge Lydon in these cases. Trial Judge Miller’s order contains a full and correct discussion of the matter, and the court adopts it as its own basis for affirming his order. Plaintiffs merely reiterate to us the unsound contention that their affidavits — stating that several aspects of Trial Judge Lydon’s findings and opinion in related cases were clearly wrong and show personal bias, prejudice, or lack of impartiality — are sufficient to call for his disqualification. As Trial Judge Miller well points out, these are inadequate reasons, even if the trial judge was wrong in his views, for [789] requiring his disqualification for personal bias, prejudice, or partiality.

Accordingly, without oral argument, Trial Judge Miller’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion for disqualification of Trial Judge Lydon is affirmed for the reasons stated in that order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baskett v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 788, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 389, 1981 WL 21485 (cc 1981).

228 Ct. Cl. 788 (Baskett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Judicial Misconduct
2 Cl. Ct. 255 (Court of Claims, 1983)