Baskett v. Brister

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baskett v. Brister

889 S.W.2d 324, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 2435, 1994 WL 544134

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 6, 1994·No. No. A14-94-00934-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 27, 1994, relator, Lana L. Coleman Baskett, filed her motion for leave to file her petition for writ of mandamus in [325]*325this Court pursuant to section 22.221 Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.

While the record reflects dubious rulings by the trial court, the rules provide a trial judge with broad discretion in the management of his court’s docket. Motion for leave to file relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

ELLIS, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 27, 1994, relator, Lana L. Coleman Baskett, filed her motion for leave to file her petition for writ of mandamus in [325]*325this Court pursuant to section 22.221 Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.

While the record reflects dubious rulings by the trial court, the rules provide a trial judge with broad discretion in the management of his court’s docket. Motion for leave to file relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

ELLIS, J., would grant.

Baskett v. Brister, 889 S.W.2d 324, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 2435, 1994 WL 544134 (Tex. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

889 S.W.2d 324 (Baskett v. Brister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.