Baskerville v. Solomon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baskerville v. Solomon

30 A.D.2d 965, 295 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 965 (Baskerville v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baskerville v. Solomon, 30 A.D.2d 965, 295 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 14, 1968, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, triable issues of fact are presented which may not be resolved without a plenary trial. Beldock, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 14, 1968, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, triable issues of fact are presented which may not be resolved without a plenary trial. Beldock, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 965, 295 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baskerville-v-solomon-nyappdiv-1968.