Basista v. Ashcroft
This text of 87 F. App'x 74 (Basista v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Beata Basista appeals from denial of her application for asylum or withholding of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her application in a summary affirmance without opinion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(7). Basista argues that the summary affirmance regulation violates her right to due process and is void for vagueness. These arguments are foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 848, 850 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, the BIA’s decision is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. App'x 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basista-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.