Basilisa Gurion Remo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 435 F.2d 1307 (Basilisa Gurion Remo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
435 F.2d 1307
Basilisa GURION REMO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 24582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 15, 1971.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Dan P. Danliov, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Eugene Cushing, U. S. Atty., John P. Boyd, Dist. Director, I. N. S., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The facts of this case strikingly resemble those in Tomboc v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 677. Under the principles there announced, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F.2d 1307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basilisa-gurion-remo-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca9-1971.