Basilisa Gurion Remo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Opinion
435 F.2d 1307
Basilisa GURION REMO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 24582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 15, 1971.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Dan P. Danliov, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Eugene Cushing, U. S. Atty., John P. Boyd, Dist. Director, I. N. S., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The facts of this case strikingly resemble those in Tomboc v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 677. Under the principles there announced, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
435 F.2d 1307 (Basilisa Gurion Remo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.