Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

946 A.2d 636
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
Docket361 EAL 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 946 A.2d 636 (Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC., 946 A.2d 636 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court misapplied the aggrieved party doctrine by requiring petitioners to cross-appeal from an earlier class certification order even though summary judgment was entered in petitioners’ favor.
(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in rejecting the trial court’s determination petitioners’ claims could be properly tried on a class-wide basis.
Justice TODD and Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 A.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basile-v-h-r-block-inc-pa-2008.