Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

946 A.2d 636

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 Pa. 392 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 25, 2008·No. 361 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court misapplied the aggrieved party doctrine by requiring petitioners to cross-appeal from an earlier class certification order even though summary judgment was entered in petitioners’ favor.

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in rejecting the trial court’s determination petitioners’ claims could be properly tried on a class-wide basis.

Justice TODD and Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court misapplied the aggrieved party doctrine by requiring petitioners to cross-appeal from an earlier class certification order even though summary judgment was entered in petitioners’ favor.

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in rejecting the trial court’s determination petitioners’ claims could be properly tried on a class-wide basis.

Justice TODD and Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC., 946 A.2d 636 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

946 A.2d 636 (Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.