Bashlor v. Bashlor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bashlor v. Bashlor

571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8518, 1990 WL 172840

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1990

DocketNo. 90-00216

StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 45 (Bashlor v. Bashlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bashlor v. Bashlor, 571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8518, 1990 WL 172840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHOONOVER, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Ronnie Stephen Bashlor, challenges an order granting the appellee’s, Lisa Leñé Bashlor, petition to modify child support payments. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the appellee carried her burden of showing a substantial change in circumstances that warranted an increase in child support payments. The record, however, does not support an increase as large as that awarded by the trial court. See Diaco v. Diaco, 363 So.2d 183 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to reconsider the amount of the award and to enter an order increasing the amount of support to no more than $500 per month.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

SCHEB and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHOONOVER, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Ronnie Stephen Bashlor, challenges an order granting the appellee’s, Lisa Leñé Bashlor, petition to modify child support payments. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the appellee carried her burden of showing a substantial change in circumstances that warranted an increase in child support payments. The record, however, does not support an increase as large as that awarded by the trial court. See Diaco v. Diaco, 363 So.2d 183 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to reconsider the amount of the award and to enter an order increasing the amount of support to no more than $500 per month.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

SCHEB and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 So. 2d 45, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8518, 1990 WL 172840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bashlor-v-bashlor-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack