Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad

192 N.E.2d 24, 13 N.Y.2d 753

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 192 N.E.2d 24 (Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 192 N.E.2d 24, 13 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur to conform with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned,” it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and matter remitted to Trial Term for entry of a judgment upon the verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellant, with costs in all courts. [See 11 N Y 2d 991, 372 U. S. 699.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur to conform with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned,” it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and matter remitted to Trial Term for entry of a judgment upon the verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellant, with costs in all courts. [See 11 N Y 2d 991, 372 U. S. 699.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.E.2d 24, 13 N.Y.2d 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basham-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ny-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack