Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad

192 N.E.2d 24, 13 N.Y.2d 753
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 6, 1963·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur to conform with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned,” it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and matter remitted to Trial Term for entry of a judgment upon the verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellant, with costs in all courts. [See 11 N Y 2d 991, 372 U. S. 699.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 192 N.E.2d 24, 13 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1963).

192 N.E.2d 24 (Basham v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trappers Lake Lodge & Resort, LLC v. Colorado Department of Revenue
179 P.3d 198 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2007)
TRAPPERS LAKE LODGE & RES. v. Dept. of Rev.
179 P.3d 198 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2007)