Home/Supreme Court/Bash v. Howald

Bash v. Howald

244 U.S. 648, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1687
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 1917·No. No. 657·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469; Stewart v. Kansas [649]*649City, 239 U. S. 14; In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 55; In re Delgado, 140 U. S. 586, 588.

Mr. P. C. Simons for plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. B. Ferguson for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bash v. Howald, 244 U.S. 648, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1687 (1917).

244 U.S. 648 (Bash v. Howald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Delgado
140 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)