Bash v. Howald

244 U.S. 648, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1687
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 11, 1917
DocketNo. 657
StatusPublished

This text of 244 U.S. 648 (Bash v. Howald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bash v. Howald, 244 U.S. 648, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1687 (1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469; Stewart v. Kansas [649]*649City, 239 U. S. 14; In re Neagle, 135 U. S. 55; In re Delgado, 140 U. S. 586, 588.

Mr. P. C. Simons for plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. B. Ferguson for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Delgado
140 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 U.S. 648, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bash-v-howald-scotus-1917.