BASF Colors & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 834, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2076
United States Customs Court·Decided November 29, 1967·No. A.R.D. 228·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BeokwoRth, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of Senior Judge Wilson holding that the merchandise hexamethylenediamine (hereinafter referred to as HMD), was properly appraised on the basis of American selling price, and affirming the appraised values. BASF Colors & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 641. R.D. 11195.

The merchandise was exported from West Germany in December 1961 and June 1963. It was appraised at $1.83 per pound, net packed, on the basis of American selling price as defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,19 U.S.C., section 1401 (e), on the ground that HMD is subject to the rate of duty for articles classifiable under paragraph 27(a) (3) (5) of the tariff act. Appellant contends that HMD is not provided for in said paragraph and is, therefore, not subject to appraisement on the basis of American selling price, but should be appraised on the basis of export value as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C., section 1401a (b).

Counsel for the parties have stipulated that, if the appraisement of the merchandise was properly based on American selling price, then

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASF Colors & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 834, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2076 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 834 (BASF Colors & Chemicals, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Control Data Corp.
69 Cust. Ct. 274 (U.S. Customs Court, 1972)
United States v. Barr Shipping Co.
68 Cust. Ct. 332 (U.S. Customs Court, 1972)