Base Marketing, Inc. Soils Control International, Inc. And Andres Jackson v. Base-Seal International, Inc. and Maxine R. Williams, Individually

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2002·No. 03-01-00229-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-01-00229-CV

Base Marketing, Inc.; Soils Control International, Inc.; and Andres Jackson, Appellants


v.



Base-Seal International, Inc.; and Maxine R. Williams, Individually, Appellees



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 161,728-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING



O R D E R


PER CURIAM



Appellants Base Marketing, Inc.; Soils Control International, Inc.; and Andres Jackson have filed a motion requesting that this Court reinstate their appeal. Appellant Soils Control International, Inc. is currently involved in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in which the automatic stay has been lifted to allow this appeal to proceed. Appellant Andres Jackson, the president of Soils Control, filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy on February 5, 2001. That proceeding has now been dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.8.3(a) (appellant may move for reinstatement if permitted by federal law or bankruptcy court).

The filing of a bankruptcy suspends the time periods on appeal. 11 U.S.C. §362; Tex. R. App. P. 8. Accordingly, the February 5, 2001 (1) filing suspended the time periods in this appeal. The notice of appeal was filed February 26, 2002. A document filed by a party while the proceeding was suspended will be deemed filed on the same day the court reinstates the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is timely and we reinstate the appeal. The complete record has already been filed. Appellant's brief is due thirty days from the date of this order.

It is ordered September 30, 2002.



Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Do Not Publish

1. Without the bankruptcy filing the notice of appeal would have been due February 7, 2001. A period that began to run and had not expired at the time the proceeding was suspended begins anew when the proceeding is reinstated. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Base Marketing, Inc. Soils Control International, Inc. And Andres Jackson v. Base-Seal International, Inc. and Maxine R. Williams, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Base Marketing, Inc. Soils Control International, Inc. And Andres Jackson v. Base-Seal International, Inc. and Maxine R. Williams, Individually (Base Marketing, Inc. Soils Control International, Inc. And Andres Jackson v. Base-Seal International, Inc. and Maxine R. Williams, Individually) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362