Bascom v. Nichols

1 Redf. 340
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Redf. 340 (Bascom v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bascom v. Nichols, 1 Redf. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Opinion

An appeal from the decision and decree of the Surrogate was taken to the general term of the Supreme Court. Pres[349]*349ent, Hon. D. P. Ingraham, P. J., and Hon. William H. Leonard, and Hon. George G. Barnard, JJ.

The surrogate’s decree was affirmed, without argument, no written opinion being rendered; but Justice Ingraham being understood to remark, that, in his opinion, the neglect of the testator to fix the time for the appointment of the trustees by the Vermont Supreme Court, was sufficient to invalidate the bequest; and that the case was within the previous ruling of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, in respect to the provisions of the will of Anson G. Phelps for the establishment of a college in Liberia;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Redf. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bascom-v-nichols-nysurct-1860.