Basch v. Sener

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Basch v. Sener

1 Pennyp. 22

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 2, 1881

DocketNo. 70

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Pennyp. 22 (Basch v. Sener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Basch v. Sener, 1 Pennyp. 22 (Pa. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We find no error in this record of which the plaintiff has any right to complain. It is well settled that if materials are supplied on the credit of a building in the course of construction and which could have been used, a lien may be filed though they never went into it at all. The charge, we think, as favorable to the plaintiff as he could have asked, and had. no tendency, as we can see, to mislead the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We find no error in this record of which the plaintiff has any right to complain. It is well settled that if materials are supplied on the credit of a building in the course of construction and which could have been used, a lien may be filed though they never went into it at all. The charge, we think, as favorable to the plaintiff as he could have asked, and had. no tendency, as we can see, to mislead the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Pennyp. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basch-v-sener-pa-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack