Bascal v. Gonzales
This text of 193 F. App'x 670 (Bascal v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Richard Merino Bascal, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, Parrilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2005), and deny the petition for review.
Reviewing de novo, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2005), we conclude that the BIA properly determined that Bascal’s conviction pursuant to California Penal Code § 261.5(a) for unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18 years is categorically a conviction for “sexual abuse of a minor.” See Afridi v. Gonzales, 442 F.3d 1212, 1217 (9th Cir.2006). Accordingly, Bascal is removable as an aggravated felon. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(A), 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bascal-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.