Barwick v. Youmans

New York Court of Common Pleas

Barwick v. Youmans

34 N.Y.S. 143, 13 Misc. 769, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 191

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 3, 1895·Published

Opinion

BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action differs from Miller v. Youmans (handed down herewith) 33 N. Y. Supp. 140, only in the fact that the action to foreclose the mechanic’s lien in which the bond upon which this action is brought was given was brought subsequent to the commencement of the Miller action; that this plaintiff was brought in as a defendant in the Miller action by order of the court dated the 30th of September, 1891; and that the amount of the recovery was different. The other facts being the same, the same conclusion is arrived at in this action as in Miller v. Youmans, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action differs from Miller v. Youmans (handed down herewith) 33 N. Y. Supp. 140, only in the fact that the action to foreclose the mechanic’s lien in which the bond upon which this action is brought was given was brought subsequent to the commencement of the Miller action; that this plaintiff was brought in as a defendant in the Miller action by order of the court dated the 30th of September, 1891; and that the amount of the recovery was different. The other facts being the same, the same conclusion is arrived at in this action as in Miller v. Youmans, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.

Barwick v. Youmans, 34 N.Y.S. 143, 13 Misc. 769, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 191 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

34 N.Y.S. 143 (Barwick v. Youmans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related