Barwick v. Farquhar

Indiana Supreme Court

Barwick v. Farquhar

20 Ind. 115

DecidedMay 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ind. 115 (Barwick v. Farquhar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barwick v. Farquhar, 20 Ind. 115 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is here upon the evidence alone. It is conflicting. "We think the judgment should be affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs. The suit is upon a promissory note made by Barwick to Farquhar. The suit for accounting, in the nature of a bill in chancery, now pending in Cincinnati, to which all the partners are parties, is the proper one in which to adjust partnership balances.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is here upon the evidence alone. It is conflicting. "We think the judgment should be affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs. The suit is upon a promissory note made by Barwick to Farquhar. The suit for accounting, in the nature of a bill in chancery, now pending in Cincinnati, to which all the partners are parties, is the proper one in which to adjust partnership balances.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ind. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barwick-v-farquhar-ind-1863.