Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE

733 N.W.2d 776, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 391, 2007 WL 1845538

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 25, 2007

DocketA07-583

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 733 N.W.2d 776 (Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE, 733 N.W.2d 776, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 391, 2007 WL 1845538 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI