Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE
733 N.W.2d 776, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 391, 2007 WL 1845538
Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE, 733 N.W.2d 776, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 391, 2007 WL 1845538 (Mich. 2007).
733 N.W.2d 776 (Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Bullis
733 N.W.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2007)