Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bartsch v. Seneca

22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2774

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 773 (Bartsch v. Seneca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartsch v. Seneca, 22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted only to the extent of directing respondent to pay for and cause to be filed in the official Family Court file the transcript of the trial and that the said transcript be ordered from the three court reporters within five days after service of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry. If the stenographic minutes are transcribed before December 1, 1964, the parties are directed to perfect these appeals for the January 1965 Term of this court. If transcribed thereafter, the parties are directed to perfect their appeals for the February 1965 Term of this court. The denial of the motion for a counsel fee on appeal is without prejudice to an application to the Family Court under section 438 of the Family Court Act for such relief. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted only to the extent of directing respondent to pay for and cause to be filed in the official Family Court file the transcript of the trial and that the said transcript be ordered from the three court reporters within five days after service of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry. If the stenographic minutes are transcribed before December 1, 1964, the parties are directed to perfect these appeals for the January 1965 Term of this court. If transcribed thereafter, the parties are directed to perfect their appeals for the February 1965 Term of this court. The denial of the motion for a counsel fee on appeal is without prejudice to an application to the Family Court under section 438 of the Family Court Act for such relief. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 773, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartsch-v-seneca-nyappdiv-1964.